Hype, and such.
21/7/07 10:49![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
owlectomyI arrived at the library at 7:30, checked out my copy of HP 7, ran down to the Burger King to get my breakfast--where the cashier said to me, "My wife was up at 4 in the morning reading that book!"
It was a nice little moment, and I think it's the flip side to all the people who are dismayed about the Harry Potter hype, and people who are into it "just because it's popular."
It is a good thing to have things in common with each other. People care about sports or Lost or Brangelina partly because they just do--and also partly because they're what people talk about. And sometimes when a friend recommends a book, you just have to read it--not only because you trust your friend's taste, but so that you'll share that thing.
People who read, we don't get that very much. Even when James Patterson writes a book that sells a couple million copies doesn't enter the pop culture to that extent; you don't strike up conversations about it. (Probably The DaVinci Code was the last novel to do so. And before that....?) And it's fun to experience being part of that. Even if you can objectively admit that the prose could use some tightening.
I probably wouldn't have so much interest in the Harry Potter books if they were just random books on a shelf that nobody else cared about. I'm not falling over myself to read the Pendragon books or anything. And I think that is okay; I don't think there's anything wrong with getting wrapped up in the hype and excited about being a part of that excitement.
On the other hand, it's good to have some skepticism about the marketing efforts of a massive publishing conglomerate that wants to sell a lot of books for $34.99. Still, I'll enjoy my free copy.
It was a nice little moment, and I think it's the flip side to all the people who are dismayed about the Harry Potter hype, and people who are into it "just because it's popular."
It is a good thing to have things in common with each other. People care about sports or Lost or Brangelina partly because they just do--and also partly because they're what people talk about. And sometimes when a friend recommends a book, you just have to read it--not only because you trust your friend's taste, but so that you'll share that thing.
People who read, we don't get that very much. Even when James Patterson writes a book that sells a couple million copies doesn't enter the pop culture to that extent; you don't strike up conversations about it. (Probably The DaVinci Code was the last novel to do so. And before that....?) And it's fun to experience being part of that. Even if you can objectively admit that the prose could use some tightening.
I probably wouldn't have so much interest in the Harry Potter books if they were just random books on a shelf that nobody else cared about. I'm not falling over myself to read the Pendragon books or anything. And I think that is okay; I don't think there's anything wrong with getting wrapped up in the hype and excited about being a part of that excitement.
On the other hand, it's good to have some skepticism about the marketing efforts of a massive publishing conglomerate that wants to sell a lot of books for $34.99. Still, I'll enjoy my free copy.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
21/7/07 18:43 (UTC)But I wouldn't want to have missed out on the crazy collective fun of Harry Potter. It's a whole other level of excitement and fun that goes beyond simply what's between the covers of the book.
Last night was our last opportunity really to dress up, to queue at midnight, or to otherwise take part in the excitement of the release of a Harry Potter book. And even though I haven't even read the book yet, haven't exhausted the excitement of that, I am already happy to have queued last night, and regretful for not doing it at Picadilly.
Maybe I'll get to dress up and join the hordes of screaming fans for one of the film premieres in future.