Dilbert creator Scott Adams posted
an article on why there wouldn't be any authors in the future because everything's going to be free.
I posted on Twitter:
We're going to see new models in the future, but a world where people care about art is a world where artists get paid.
And if our future is a world where people don't care about art -- I can't begin to contemplate it.
And I wanted to take a minute -- and more than 140 characters -- to square that with what I believe about gift economies.
Because I believe that gift economies are fantastic. And I believe that gift economies are fantastic for art more than they are necessarily fantastic for things like shoes and iPods.
It is excellent when people create things for free. The question is, do you have enough time for it? If I'm working full-time, and also trying to write at a reasonable pace, then I'm cutting out nearly all TV, cutting my social life down to the bone, and probably not doing my laundry as often as I should -- and I don't have a spouse or kids, and nobody cares if my supper is Cheerios out of the box.
So, to me, saying that artists will create for free is kind of like saying teachers should teach for the pure joy of teaching so you don't have to pay them much. Even if you have an intense passion for it, even if you would do it for free, you can't choose to do it for free if you want to keep yourself fed and housed. Or, you can choose to do it for free, but then you still have to find something to spend 8 hours a day on to pay the bills. And I don't know how you get
Anna Karenina or
Crime and Punishment if you've got a world where all the writers have day jobs and no hope of being paid for their writing.
I am gambling that, collectively, that's not the future we're going to accept.