owlectomy: A squashed panda sewing a squashed panda (Default)
[personal profile] owlectomy
I hadn't heard Geoff Pullum's ringing endorsement of singular "they" before. I'm a fan of singular "they," personally, but it's very convincing in how awful some of the alternatives sound:

A journalist can’t be so shy that he or she can’t bring himself or herself to go up to a stranger he or she sees and ask him or her to give him or her his or her opinion.’

Oh? 'He' is gender-neutral? Well--


‘Was it your father or your mother who hurt himself?’

Good enough for Jane Austen and W.H. Auden is good enough for me.

(no subject)

24/2/07 20:18 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] ravenstormcrow.livejournal.com
Singular "they" used to be standard English, or as standard as English got before the advent of Webster's Dictionary and similar. I've taken to using it myself, because I am also not fond of "sie," "zie," "hir," and similar "gender-neutral" constructions. Although I might still write "wo/man" or "God/dess" where appropriate.

Profile

owlectomy: A squashed panda sewing a squashed panda (Default)
owlectomy

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21 222324252627
28293031   
Page generated 31/1/26 16:27

Disclaimer

All opinions are my own and do not reflect those of my employer

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags