owlectomy: A squashed panda sewing a squashed panda (Default)
[personal profile] owlectomy
Dilbert creator Scott Adams posted an article on why there wouldn't be any authors in the future because everything's going to be free.

I posted on Twitter:

We're going to see new models in the future, but a world where people care about art is a world where artists get paid.

And if our future is a world where people don't care about art -- I can't begin to contemplate it.


And I wanted to take a minute -- and more than 140 characters -- to square that with what I believe about gift economies.

Because I believe that gift economies are fantastic. And I believe that gift economies are fantastic for art more than they are necessarily fantastic for things like shoes and iPods.

It is excellent when people create things for free. The question is, do you have enough time for it? If I'm working full-time, and also trying to write at a reasonable pace, then I'm cutting out nearly all TV, cutting my social life down to the bone, and probably not doing my laundry as often as I should -- and I don't have a spouse or kids, and nobody cares if my supper is Cheerios out of the box.

So, to me, saying that artists will create for free is kind of like saying teachers should teach for the pure joy of teaching so you don't have to pay them much. Even if you have an intense passion for it, even if you would do it for free, you can't choose to do it for free if you want to keep yourself fed and housed. Or, you can choose to do it for free, but then you still have to find something to spend 8 hours a day on to pay the bills. And I don't know how you get Anna Karenina or Crime and Punishment if you've got a world where all the writers have day jobs and no hope of being paid for their writing.

I am gambling that, collectively, that's not the future we're going to accept.

(no subject)

8/6/10 13:35 (UTC)
antarcticlust: Silhouette of a reclining figure in front of the moon. (Default)
Posted by [personal profile] antarcticlust
I totally agree with you, except that historically, authors have had day jobs. Writers supporting themselves with their art is a relatively recent phenomenon. Which is certainly not to argue against artists getting paid! But most of our literary canon was written by people with day jobs.

(no subject)

8/6/10 13:36 (UTC)
antarcticlust: Silhouette of a reclining figure in front of the moon. (Default)
Posted by [personal profile] antarcticlust
Of course, the "no hope of being paid for their writing" is a totally different matter. :)

(no subject)

9/6/10 20:57 (UTC)
foxfirefey: Dreamwidth: social content with dimension. (dreamwidth)
Posted by [personal profile] foxfirefey
Can I point this post out on [community profile] dreamlight?

(no subject)

8/6/10 23:39 (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] writerjenn.livejournal.com
It takes a long time to learn to write well, to polish a novel to its highest gloss. I, too, hope that one way or another, writers will continue to have the means to take that time and produce work of that quality.

Profile

owlectomy: A squashed panda sewing a squashed panda (Default)
owlectomy

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21 222324252627
28293031   
Page generated 31/12/25 22:55

Disclaimer

All opinions are my own and do not reflect those of my employer

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags